<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sitelinks &#8211; not explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://old.gutermann.net/2006/09/25/google-sitelinks-not-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://old.gutermann.net/2006/09/25/google-sitelinks-not-explained/</link>
	<description>Debian Linux, Lotus Notes, Oracle, Rootserver, Tools, Links, Persönliches, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:37:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steffen Gutermann</title>
		<link>http://old.gutermann.net/2006/09/25/google-sitelinks-not-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-3550</link>
		<dc:creator>Steffen Gutermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gutermann.net/2006/09/25/google-sitelinks-not-explained/#comment-3550</guid>
		<description>Well there seems to be something to that, WHICH would mean that this is NOT truly automated. Someone must be looking at what the automation figured out and then hit OK or NOT OK.

Why am I saying this ... well if you try &quot;audi&quot; for instance. It is clear that this is a brand. It shows up with sitelinks in google.de not on google.com. Why ??

Let&#039;s take &quot;raindance&quot; ... even though it is a brand and does show up for the rightful owner of the brand (hnsgrohe) there are no sitelinks. Try the same on google.com ... and you get yet anther product named raindance ... but they have got sitelinks.

Here my final example which convinced me that someone is looking at all of that before it goes online ... try &quot;flying&quot; on google.com. It is a common Word, there is no Trademark or anything possible on that word. But here we are with &quot;Flying Magazine&quot;.  There is no way the &quot;automation&quot; knew that, a human on the other side decided.

So what it looks like we&#039;ve got is an automation which picks up on all possible possibilities for sitelinks and then a guy or team which sits there and says YES or NO.

Well, this info didn&#039;t really help either now, did it. Someone got a phone number to that team at google ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there seems to be something to that, WHICH would mean that this is NOT truly automated. Someone must be looking at what the automation figured out and then hit OK or NOT OK.</p>
<p>Why am I saying this &#8230; well if you try &#8220;audi&#8221; for instance. It is clear that this is a brand. It shows up with sitelinks in google.de not on google.com. Why ??</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take &#8220;raindance&#8221; &#8230; even though it is a brand and does show up for the rightful owner of the brand (hnsgrohe) there are no sitelinks. Try the same on google.com &#8230; and you get yet anther product named raindance &#8230; but they have got sitelinks.</p>
<p>Here my final example which convinced me that someone is looking at all of that before it goes online &#8230; try &#8220;flying&#8221; on google.com. It is a common Word, there is no Trademark or anything possible on that word. But here we are with &#8220;Flying Magazine&#8221;.  There is no way the &#8220;automation&#8221; knew that, a human on the other side decided.</p>
<p>So what it looks like we&#8217;ve got is an automation which picks up on all possible possibilities for sitelinks and then a guy or team which sits there and says YES or NO.</p>
<p>Well, this info didn&#8217;t really help either now, did it. Someone got a phone number to that team at google ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://old.gutermann.net/2006/09/25/google-sitelinks-not-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-3549</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gutermann.net/2006/09/25/google-sitelinks-not-explained/#comment-3549</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a bit more information about &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.seoptimise.com/2006/09/google-sitelinks.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Sitelinks&lt;/a&gt;, it seems that these only appear for terms that are clearly the number 1 result, e.g. brand or company names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a bit more information about <a href="http://blog.seoptimise.com/2006/09/google-sitelinks.html" rel="nofollow">Google Sitelinks</a>, it seems that these only appear for terms that are clearly the number 1 result, e.g. brand or company names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
